Author Archives: Admin

long term plans and changes

Humans don’t tend to think in the long-term.  Lunchtime is the extent of most folks plans. Let’s face it, most of us don’t have to go above and beyond our immediate needs.  Slightly ambitious people will look ahead to next weekend or maybe shop early for Christmas.  We may have some vague notions as to how we want our lives to proceed or how our business careers will develop but mostly we don’t go into minute detail as to how things will go.

Bosses, business leaders, politicians,  and other people who are in charge have to think ahead. But even these plans don’t go past next year or some five-year plan.

As I said, we don’t plan for the long haul.   It’s just not necessary for most of us because it’s won’t really affect us negatively if we don’t.

In fact, in some cases it may be detrimental to be thinking about the long-term while others grasp the opportunities that present themselves in the present.  Those quick enough to grasp those opportunities benefit.   Those that don’t suffer so the tendency is to go after the quick reward and eschew looking at the long-term.

So why should anyone plan for the long-term or even just understand long-term change?  Well cause at a deeper and more fundamental level most of the important things in life happen in the long-term.  I mean really long-term.

It’s somewhat difficult for the average person to visualize what deep time is or how it works.  Deep time is the concept that most of the big things in life-like plate tectonics, evolution, long-term climate, these things don’t work themselves out immediately or even slowly.  These things work themselves out ultra slowly.  They work on the principle of slow and steady pressure over an unfathomable time scale to coalesce and to morph from one situation into another.  They defy the attempts for a young impatient species to define and visualize.

The sun affects our planet through gravity and radiation shaping and altering the landforms which in turn determine the type of vegetation that will grow and then makes animal life adapt to fit these available plants and finally humans take stock of all these factors and change their lifestyle, their culture, their religion to suit these things.  We begin the process on one end with billions of years of change and at the other centuries or just decades of change.

I don’t want to get all Disney but it is a huge web but not just a web of life but a web of reality.  A delicate balance that has worked itself out and harmonized over an unimaginable time scale.

Yet in the last few hundred years we as humans have done things to our environment to alter and disturb these long-term cycles without any sort of thought towards the long-term consequences of our actions.

We force a meandering river to stay in a particular channel because it suits our needs, we cut down a forest on a hillside without considering erosion, we wipe out entire species for our convenience.

Even in our own man-made world we do things without forethought.  Some giant retailer comes to a small town and devastates the local small shop owners, clogs the local small roads with traffic that these roads can’t handle, and litters the ground with a plague of cheap plastic shopping bags.  The retailers only concern is if the local community can be harvested for a profit.  The other ramifications of their actions are unimportant.

We not only have to be cognizant that our actions have immediate repercussions but we also have to consider how our plans fit into the long-term development of any system.

Why is this so important nowadays?  Our progress, our industry, our consumption of raw resources is such that we are approaching a point that no deviation from our current course will be possible.  A sort of inertia is building up that threatens to be not just unstoppable but unalterable.  We may not be able to force this path to deviate at all.

And if it does turn out to be the wrong path, what then?  We are as far as I know the only creature in the world that is able to think in an abstract manner.  We can visualize, plan, and consider things in our minds long before we move a muscle or disturb a blade of grass.  Why is that we have to rush headlong into what might be a dangerous and foolhardy path?  Let’s use this gift we have (perhaps the only real gift we have) to think and figure things out before embarking on what might be a tragic course of events.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The reason why

Life isn’t merely meant to be survived.  I’ve noticed that attitude among people more and more as I get older.  They just merely want to get through the day and start the next one.  Like some overly complicated maze that we as rats have to run round to get our daily cheese.

Living life this way is damaging.  I don’t care how stress free your life is or how mentally tough you are.  This will damage you over time.  We build up toxic and damaging “mental gunk” in our thought processes.  We unconsciously develop bad mental habits and corrosive attitudes.

Vacations aren’t merely luxuries or a foolish waste of time.  They serve a very real purpose.  Even if it consists merely of sitting on the couch and watching TV for an extended period of time, you need to step back from that routine that you’ve worked out for yourself and you need time to consider.

Consider if this is where you really want to be going in life.  Whether what you’re doing in your life is really the best thing to do or whether you should change your routine.  But mainly you need to unplug and relax.

Consider the mind at work or in its routine as an athlete that gets no rest.  All the time going and going and going.  Like some sort of marathon runner.  Even the most adept and determined runner will hit a wall from time to time and not be able to continue racing.  The results are not pretty.  Recovery is a long and arduous process.

Why then do Americans have such an adversarial relationship with vacations?  We have the shortest vacation time on average of all the industrialized world.  I feel that some people almost feel ashamed of taking time off.  Will the world end if you take some time off?  I can assure you that this ball of rock and metal that we live on won’t fall apart if you take some time off.

So you still need to justify it?  Vacation with a purpose then.  Make it a vacation tailored to meet your relaxing and therapeutic needs.  Take yoga classes, mud baths or massages, learn a new hobby or sport.  Visit a place that you’ve never been before or would normally never go to.

Most of all realize that you weren’t meant to live inside a cubicle or air-conditioned building.

Conspiracies VI

This is the one that everyone talks about.

Possibly the closest thing that we have in American history to compare to the legend of King Arthur or Barbarossa or perhaps even to the expulsion from the garden of Eden.  The story of a golden age in American history brought to a violent end by the murder of a man of legend.  A pivotal point in American and even world history.  People are left wondering what might have been.

A whole industry has cropped up around the assassination of President Kennedy in the last fifty years.  Books, movies, TV specials, that all claim to know the absolute truth and put forward theories as diverse as they are colorful.

The undisputed facts of the case are:

1. Kennedy was shot twice in Dallas.

2., and that he died.

Beyond that, all else is seemingly up for grabs.

Suspects

It seems everyone had a reason to kill Kennedy.  From Fidel Castro, to Cuban right-wing rebels, to the mob, to the CIA, to vice president Johnson, to a group of army generals and wealthy businessmen, to a witch’s curse put on the Kennedy family back in Ireland, and finally to a disgruntled young man who was a failure.

Various sets of “proof” have been put forward by authors, enthusiasts, movie directors all of which seem to solve the case.  However all rely on sketchy evidence, wrong assumptions, and sometimes outright lies.

Gerald Posner tackled some of the more popular theories in his book in his tome “Case Closed” in 1995 as a direct answer to the 1991 Oliver Stone movie “JFK

JFK” itself concerns the theory set forth by a New Orleans district attorney, Jim Garrison, that a cabal set out to murder the president and that Lee Harvey Oswald was put up as a patsy for the murder.

Garrison himself was known to launch cases against public officials and against corruption in New Orleans always trying to land on the front page of the local papers for the sake of his political career.  He ended up prosecuting a local businessman as part of a plot to murder the President.  Garrison was only able to produce unreliable witnesses and speculation.  The case was decided against Garrison in less than fifteen minutes

In the end the case did have a lasting effect as it brought phrases into pop culture such as “magic bullet” and “lone gunman”.  The case would also begin the trend of the general public of doubting and mistrusting the government’s explanations for anything.

Motives

The possible motivations to assassinate the president vary widely and in some cases seem contradictory.

Kennedy had partially left Cuba to Castro.  Operations set in motion in the Eisenhower era such as the invasion of Cuba had been abandoned and hundreds of men were left stranded on a tropical beach to face capture and torture. A large expat Cuban community in South Florida became displeased with the president.  Something that they definitely expressed in the ballot boxes for the next fifty years.  But did they do more?

Castro was no big fan either.  Kennedy had initiated “Operation Mongoose” to subvert Castro’s regime.  Using CIA backed sabotage teams they blew up bridges, burned sugar cane crops and mined harbors.  What made it personal was that Kennedy had his brother Bobby Kennedy run the operation for him.  The Cuban intelligence agency (the Dirección General de Inteligencia) is a world-class agency and certainly had the resources to pull off an assassination.

Vice president Johnson himself was not a happy man.  A career politician, he had become Kennedy’s running mate out of necessity.  A skilled politician, he could get congressional support for any of Kennedy’s policies when necessary but he was looked down upon by most of the Kennedy family and seen as little more than an ill-mannered oaf.  It seems that the only one that personally liked Johnson was president Kennedy himself.

The Kennedy clans’ plans were to have John Kennedy get his two terms and then have Bobby continue the dynasty leaving Johnson out in the cold.  It would be understandable that the vice president might feel ill-used. But was he capable of organizing such a thing?

The mob wasn’t too happy either.  The Kennedy administration had vigorously gone after the mob in the early 60’s and had begun to damage their operations.  Another theory speculates that the Kennedy campaign had reneged on campaign promises made to the mob to help him win the white house in 1960.  Some have speculated that Kennedy had some particular links to the mob in Chicago and that their support in the 1960 election had put Illinois in Kennedy’s camp for the presidential election.

Other mob motives might tie back into the Cuban angle as the mob was very interested in restoring links to a lucrative per-revolution gambling arrangement in Cuba.  Kennedy’s seemingly lax policy on Cuba might have seemed detrimental to their interests.

Lastly it is speculated that a simmering feud between the president’s father Joseph Kennedy and the mob existed from decades past and that this was payback.

The one group most credited is a mix of the CIA, the pentagon, and big business.  It is widely speculated that Kennedy intended to withdraw from Vietnam and to restart nuclear arms talks with the soviets.  The threat of seeming to be weak against communism and the curtailing of “blank check” military spending would be a threat to these parties.

The most far-fetched theory is that a curse was placed on the Kennedy clan due to an ancestor of Kennedy offending a witch in Ireland.  This would take the form of various members of the clan dying violently or ruining their careers.

Lastly we are left with a young man.  A man who had been a failure in most things he had done, a man who was almost totally disregarded by life but who craved attention.  A man who could do only do one thing well.  He could shoot a rifle.

labels

I’ve heard of growing out of your clothes but growing in?

You would think it would be a nice problem to have until you get caught short one Friday night and find the pants you were counting on fall to the floor without a belt and even with a belt they look like a tent that got wrangled into giving yeoman service as a garment.  Thankfully blue jeans can pinch hit in most cases.  But not in all cases.

Another article of clothing for the donation pile.  Another trip to the…. mall for me.

(GROAN)

Collective individuality.  A somewhat derisive and cynical term that I picked up in high school but the older I get, the more true it becomes.  I thought we were bad back then with our swatch watches, “stone washed” jeans, and Miami vice pastels.  Today’s youth culture revels in fashion labels and wearing clothes that are nothing more than advertising for the companies.

Kids wander up and down the mall each wearing a slightly different version of the same t-shirt with a tiny variation in color or design.  All of them pretty oblivious to that fact apparently.

I swear that I will never understand the appeal of having a corporate logo or a company name emblazoned on your clothes.  I can understand wearing team colors for your local professional or college team.  But a corporate logo for a company you don’t work for?  How?  How is that fashion or even desirable?

If I wear a suit to an office meeting or a formal event I am not going to have Brooks Brothers in bright red letters on the lapels.  I want it to be a well made garment, to fit me, and to look as nondescript as possible.

I suppose labels are unavoidable in some ways.  Manufacturers want the public to know that their product sells and that large numbers of the general public like to wear that product.

Fine, accepted.

My gripe isn’t with the manufacturers or designers.  They’re just doing their jobs.  It’s with the general public.  Take a hard look at your closet.  Is this what you are?  Are you nothing more than a sale and an advertising space for big companies or are you someone who wants something comfortable and stylish to wear?  And if you just want something comfortable and stylish to wear, why does it have to have a logo on it?

Why must clothing be about showing that you have access to the same clothes that some famous person wears?  Can we instead see clothing as something desirable by the way that it is distinctly individualized to meet your style and comfort needs?

Further if someone does feel this way, can they be lauded rather than ridiculed?

 

 

 

 

Your Halloween viewing guide

I sometimes listen to a program on NPR called The Dinner party Download. They sometimes give suggestions for food, music, and other details for dinner parties as well as cover all sorts of topics.

In that spirit I thought I would put together a list of Halloween movies appropriate for the season in case you find yourself alone or with friends one of these October nights and have a yearning for something seasonal.  I have mixed in some comedies as well as horror movies.  Halloween is meant to be fun after all.  Probably should watch these at night with the lights out for maximum effect

 

 The Walking dead – Incredibly this is in its fifth season.  I mean, I thought the whole zombie premise was barely plausible enough for one 90-minute movie but these folks have managed to squeeze out years of TV revolving around a small band of survivors stuck in a zombie world.  This features the latest in gory special effects.  The plot deals more with character interactions than with the zombie apocalypse.  The stories are solid enough to keep you hooked and the writers aren’t scared of killing off fan favorite characters just to keep things fresh.

Kolchak: The Nightstalker – One of those forgotten gems of 70s television.  Revolves around a reporter who gets drawn into all sorts of strange and spooky situations.  Pretty basic special effects but the writing and acting is solid.  The direct ancestor of the X-files.  You can probably find it online.  More campy than scary.

Salem’s lot – One of the first adaptations of a Stephen King novel.  Follows a writer that returns to his home town as a mysterious plague begins turning the citizens into vampires.  If you expect sparkly vampires then this isn’t for you.  These vampires tend more towards the gruesome.

Ed Wood – Homage to the worst director ever.  Johnny Depp’s portrayal of this pioneer of bad horror movies is hilarious and probably dead on.

The Ninth gate – Speaking of Johnny Depp he does a brilliant job of portraying an antique books collector obsessed with recovering a satanic bible from the clutches of an occult group.

Ghostbusters – A well made comedy.  Excellent special effects for the mid 1980s.  Thoroughly researched and put together.  I wish scriptwriters could still turn out work of this caliber.

The legend of Hell House – I don’t know if I can say that this was based (even indirectly) on Shirley Jackson’s House on haunted hill.  Both movies are quite similar.  Though I find Legend to be more horrifying than its predecessor.

Beetlejuice – Michael Keaton shows his comedic talents in this comedy about a pair of ghosts trying to reclaim their home from the new tenants; a pair of yuppies from New York City.

The Exorcist – I will be frank.  I am not a fan of gory movies or over the top so-called horror movies.  They really aren’t horror movies.  They are shocking movies with lots of blood.  To me horror is something more subdued and malevolent.  This is why I like this movie.  The evil and horror sneaks up on you little by little.  It is still the only movie that scares me.  Everyone talks about the infamous pea soup scene but they tend to forget (perhaps on purpose) the horror built up to that point.  It’s the little things you don’t see off camera that allow the imagination to run wild and scare you more.

The Exorcist III – The Exorcist series was widely panned and I guess with some good reason but I find III did a good job of tying back to the original story.  Brad Dourif does an over the top job as a demonic serial killer

 

add capacity, add capability

These last few years have been a period of expanding my horizon, shoring up my deficiencies and adding muscle to what I already have.  Hard to say what the overriding motivation has been but the results have been most satisfying.

I’ve had to learn and add new skills to what I could do and learn about things that I never thought I would need to tackle in the past.  The most surprising thing has been that it hasn’t been as hard as I once thought it would be.

For a long time I would not try new things or would not delve deeper into skills and abilities that I already had.  I had grown complacent and content with what I knew.  But one day I looked around and came to the realization that what I knew or what I could do was no longer enough.

People around me, not just younger people but people my own age were passing me by and surpassing me.

“You paint?  when did that happen?”

“you can weld?”

“You know everything about home-refinancing?”

“You can program in Java?”

People around me had a plethora of skills that I never realized that they had and here I was thinking that I knew so much.  Now I’m not saying I’m going to go out and do all these things and master them.  I am however slowly adding to my capabilities and learning more and more.

One reason is that I want to be more self-sufficient and know more about life in general.  Doing things helps me learn about things.  Jumping right in and trying things is a great way to learn.  Another reason is that it keeps me busy and keeps my mind fresh.  Slipping into ruts where you do the same thing year after year is dangerous.

Sure you should have some patterns in your life but don’t get stuck into a fossilized mindset.  Stretch out and try.

 

the rings

Everyone has them. We sub-divide and classify people in our lives into different strata.

Rings of familiarity.  Depending on how small those rings are there are things that you will and won’t discuss with these people.  Things that you will and won’t do with people in these groups.  Generally the rings run (from outermost to innermost) nation, tribe, acquaintance, friend, family, me.  My rings are a little different.

 

From the outermost layer we start with all of humanity in its many customs, religions and quirks.  Our outermost layer of affinity.  Despite all the stupid or terrible things that we do we understand that we’re all human.

We don’t personally interact much with people on the other side of the planet or even most people in our own cities.  I will however listen and hear about their problems on the news or internet or in some magazine and empathize.  Most likely this represents about 99.995% of humanity to you (literally, do the math if you don’t believe me).

 

Next comes the national ring.  This is becoming a rapidly outdated and meaningless distinction as people from all over the world mix and match and settle where they think they best belong.  What it means to be English, or American, or Indian, or Haitian or Malaysian is changing.  Not only are people migrating more but the internet is having a homogenizing effect on culture.

At the moment it does have a little validity if only because people for the most part still acknowledge it.  This ring, much like the tribal ring, will disappear.  I don’t see this ring lasting more than a couple hundred more years at most.

 

Next we have the lesser acquaintances.  The cashier you see maybe twice a month or that guy that jogs past every morning and says hello out of reflex.  You may share some absent-minded comments with them such as “how bout this heat?” or “what about that local sports team?”.  But mostly it’s for form’s sake.

You don’t expect or think this interaction will lead to anything else and you certainly don’t expect to share some deep problem with them.  Of course there’s migration between the rings but it takes time and effort from both parties to boost a person out of this ring up to the next level.  This makes up the bulk of the people who “you know”.

 

Next come the greater acquaintances.  These people you see on a weekly to daily basis.  Maybe you chat with them on social media, maybe they’re neighbors, or co-workers.  They know more about you and you know more about them.  But generally what you share is what you allow to be shared.  You’re still somewhat guarded around these people.

 

We then come to the friends layer.  This also has inner and outer layers as well.  I would say one way that the distinction is made as to who is inner and who is outer is the age of the relationship.  Generally older relationships are deeper and therefore inner relationships.  Friends get access to more details of your life and get to hear some of the daily worries and maybe even some family gossip.

With friends you also start seeing some built-in and unspoken obligations appear.  It’s generally understood that I will pick up a stranded friend in the middle of the night without a second thought, I will go to their wedding and not turn up with the cheapest gift on the registry, I will sit and listen to whatever is on their mind.

 

The family ring.  The people you’ve known the longest.  They will expect to have something to say about anything that you share with them and they expect that you will have something to say about anything that they share.  Families can be close, they can be distant, competitive.  This is the layer where the kidney transplants and the “loan your brother, money ” events occur.  It’s also the layer where you can get so angry with them that you can’t stand it.  But in the end you take them back cause they are family.

 

Lastly is me.  Ideally there should be one last layer before reaching me.  That one special person you share everything with and that knows you so well that they might as well be you.  You might think that this person should be in the family ring but no, this is the person that you have a special bond with and that you want to share as much as possible with.

At least this is how I see my world.

just do it

A mantra for a popular shoe company or an attitude to live one’s life by?

I was recently talking to someone who had a myriad of options to consider as far as their career including job options in Houston that weren’t quite what they wanted and career options on the east coast that were better but would involve uprooting their lives and moving.  They had been weighing the pros and cons all summer long and now some of the offers were expiring and they had to make a decision.

They asked my opinion.

Firstly this is one of those things I hate opining on as I didn’t know all the ins and outs of this person’s, what their deepest desires are, how they really see their life shaping up and all those other fine details that really make a difference.  So I took a middle of the road approach.

I told them to just pick one and go.  Didn’t really matter which but do it.  Of course they asked what if they chose wrong?  I told them it didn’t matter.  Making a decision was better than no decision when it comes down to it.  Standing around paralyzed with indecision was the worst state to be in.

So they chose to move.  Will it be a good decision?  Yes and no.  I’m sure that there will be ups and downs along the way but this person is young and still has time to grow and learn.  But sitting around and waiting for things to be decided for them, that’s worse.

Whatever you do, take charge of your own life.  Be the one that makes the decisions instead of letting life decide things for you.

Tooling up for success

When I first decided to get fit (about 5 years ago now) I started out walking.  I wore blue jeans with a regular t-shirt and wore casual shoes.  I soon realized that for what I needed to do that this would never do.  So I went to Walmart and got the only athletic gear that they had, which was basketball shorts and regular tennis shoes and that’s what I started with.

Over time I’ve refined this as circumstances dictated and have found that little tweaks in my gear can make a big difference not only in comfort but in performance.  So here are a few hard-won lessons that I’ve discovered over the years and miles.

Footwear

Now even the most novice runner will know the importance of having proper footwear.  When you really get deep into it you will have to make a choice between lightweight footwear and well padded footwear.  If you read websites and articles you will be bombarded by all sorts of buzzwords and “new technologies” and you may be tempted to dismiss all of this as foolishness.

But the thing is that some types of footwear do make a difference.  I got rid of the clunky tennis shoes that I bought at Walmart in about 3 months and graduated to a pair of Brooks running shoes recommended to me by the staff at a dedicated athletic shoe store.  I still remember the first run.  The shoes almost felt like they were begging me to run.  I had a literal spring in my step.  Now I can’t recommend these shoes for you.  Your feet are your business and these may feel terrible to you and maybe another brand of shoes might be better for you.  You may not even need expensive shoes.  I know a guy who bought a pair of knock off sneakers at a flea market for $25 and used them for 5 years.  All I can tell you that the proper footwear can make the difference between feeling good at the end of your run or feeling achy and tired.

Clothes

The lighter the better obviously but you also want clothes that will wick away moisture from you as you run.  Regular cotton t-shirts are generally closed knitted and don’t let heat escape and they soak up moisture and make you feel clammy and heavy.  What you want is a mesh like material that let’s air breathe through as you run and that let’s water or sweat drain.

As to shorts you want something a little closer fitting, not too loose.  Pockets are also a good idea.

Gear

I started out running with nothing but the clothes on my back and my house key.  I added a pedometer watch but I found that a little bit limited in function.  Last year I bought a smartphone with a pedometer function and I carry it on my armband.  Not just handy for keeping track of my mileage but a useful backup in case anything happens on the road.  I found a good plastic waterproof case that protects the phone from the rain and my sweat and so far the system is working out great.

I don’t generally go in for other items like sunglasses or hats or sweat bands.  I prefer to go lighter.  Besides which I generally run before the sun’s up anyways.

Winter running may require an extra layer but I’ve gone out in shorts and t-shirt in 30something temperatures in February and returned soaked in sweat.  You just have to tough out the first few minutes till you warm up.  One thing you do want to mind is cold wind or snow.  That’s when you should add a layer.

 

The right gear won’t turn you into a world-class marathon runner or break records but for the average runner it can make the difference between sticking with the sport or quitting from frustration.

in defense of bad dietary habits

A series of articles have come out in the last year concerning the intake of salt in our diets and its impact on our general health.  One study concluded that there was no marked benefit in limiting salt intake and another concluded that there were some risks in having an abnormally low salt diet.

I have also read reports on the benefits of caffeine and negligible risks posed by caffeinated coffee for seniors with Alzheimer’s disease.

Quite a turnaround from the late 60’s onwards when these were demonized food items to be avoided at all costs.  Now of course these recent studies come with all sorts of conditions and caveats about not overdoing it.  But back when these dietary restrictions came into place there were no stipulations made.

All of these recent findings began in the late 80s with studies looking into the benefits of wine for people with heart disease.  This was based on anecdotal evidence and folk beliefs among Europeans that “wine cuts grease” and that imbibing wine helped people digest food with high fat content.  The benefits were not all that great but they are somewhat present.

When we started getting warnings about salt, caffeine, and other things that we ingest, the studies back then didn’t blush or mince words.  They were unapologetically negative about these things.  No reservations, no qualifiers.  These things were bad.  Avoid at all costs.  Better to err on the side of safety and all that.

But now we get revised research and we do get conditions.  What’s a person to believe?

Perhaps people should follow their common sense more and listen to speculative research less.  I don’t expect any time soon to see a study lauding or praising the benefits of smoking, or binge drinking, or an all lard diet. Even the most rudimentary common sense tells you that inhaling smoke isn’t good for you.  Your liver will take issue with you over drinking all the time.  Your bowels will exact revenge for eating so much fat all the time.

I think we all know what we need to do.  Namely don’t overdo it on any food item and get off the couch more.

No one can seriously believe that chain-smoking or drinking all the time will lead to a healthy life but I don’t see the harm of occasionally indulging in some “forbidden food” or treat that was considered bad for you for so long.  As long as your overall eating habits remain healthy and you live an active lifestyle I say pass the salt, please.